cosmotica

TestALL.org

cosmotica

Home

Articles

Definitions

Equipment

Persons

Services

Standards

Testing

Articles:

Air Permeability and Linting of Woven, Nonwoven, and Coated Fabrics for Cleanroom Garments

Author(s):
Brenda Brandt - School of Family and Consumer Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
Publication:
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, Vol. 18, No. 3, 236-244 (1990)
Year:
1990
Abstract:
Linting and air permeability properties of commercially available fabrics used in protective cleanroom garments were studied to determine fabric performance. Fabrics tested varied widely as to air permeability, with coated membrane con structions and two types of nonwovens having the lowest air permeability values and allowing less air passage than wovens and other nonwoven fabrics. Results from linting tests indicated that coated membrane fabrics produced the least lint and nonwovens produced the most. Woven fabrics fell in the mid-range of lint produced. Of the three construction types, coated fabrics were found to be the least linting and the most effective in inhibiting air passage. Cleanroom garment manufacturers should explore the use of other coated constructions as fabrics for protective clothing in cleanrooms. These coated constructions are examples of the latest in fabric coating technology and are similar to the coated membrane fabrics analyzed in this study with respect to limited air passage and low linting properties.
Text Link:
Equipment Cited:
References:

Benoit, E. (1984). A whole new set of tricks. Forbes , 134, 216-222.
Bowser, J. (1985). Cleanroom performance of garment systems of expanded PTFE laminate. Paper presented at the 16th Nordic R3 Symposium, Ronneby, Sweden.
Brinton, S.J., & Swick, R.H. (1984). Evaluation of the elements of cleanroom garments for protection and comfort. Institute of Environmental Sciences , 4, 163 —165.
Buras, E.M., & Harris, R.H. (1983). Generation of lint from fabrics. Textile Chemist and Colorist, 15, 17-19.
Cote, W.A. (1983). Scanning surgical textiles. Textile Industires, 2, 42-43.
Galbraith, R.L. (1975). Abrasion of textile surfaces. In M. J. Schick (Ed.), Surface characteristics of fibers and textiles (pp. 193 —225). New York: Marcel Dekker.
Lomax, G.R. (1985). Coated fabrics: part 1— lightweight breathable fabrics. Textiles, 14, 2-8.
Mcllvaine Company. (1987 ). Does Japan do it better ? Cleanroom Operations Newsletter, 1, 1-8.
Siekman, O. (1983). Features and testing of cleanroom apparel. journal of Environmental Sciences, 26, 36-39.
Smith, R., & Dekker, C. (1985). Cleanroom apparel: A sterile world teeming with growth opportunities. Industrial Fabric Products Review, 4, 61-66.
Useller, J. (1969). Cleanroom technology. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Utilization, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Weber, C.W., & Wieckowski, J.M. (1982). The effects of variations in garment protection on cleanroom cleanliness levels. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 25, 13-15.
Whyte, W., & Bailey, P.V. (n.d.). Unpublished manuscript. University of Glasgow Building Services Research Unit, Glasgow, Scotland.
Williamson, J.E. (1982). Linting: A Literature Review. INDA Technical Symposium Papers, 146-169, 178.

Article Topics:

Abrasion

Air Permeability


Testing Equipment

cosmotica
This website makes no claim to any trademarked products or copyrighted text contained within.
TestALL+at+gmail+dot+com

cosmotica